UMC JUDICIAL COUNCIL UPHOLDS GUARANTEED APPOINTMENT FOR CLERGY

UMC High Court Upholds Guaranteed Appointment for Clergy
The following copy of the Judicial Council Decision 1226 supporting guaranteed annual appointment for ordained elders was obtained from Michael Mumme via Facebook.
JUDICIAL COUNCIL OF THE UNITED METHODIST CHURCH DECISION 1226
IN RE: Request from the General Conference for a Declaratory Decision as to the constitutionality of legislation Approved as Calendar Item 355 Regarding Guaranteed Appointments

DIGEST
Security of appointment has long been a part of the tradition of The United Methodist Church and its predecessor bodies. Abolishing security of appointment would destroy our historic plan for our itinerant superintendency. Fair process procedures, trials and appeals are integral parts of the privilege of our clergy of right to trial by a committee and of appeal and is an absolute right which cannot be eradicated by legislation. The amendments to ¶ 337, as contained in Calendar Item 355, are unconstitutional and violate the third and fourth restrictive rules of the Constitution. The original ¶ 337 of the Discipline is restored and maintained and the changes made thereto at 2012 General Conference are null, void and of no effect. The amendments to ¶ 321, as contained in Calendar Items 352, is also declared repugnant to the Constitution and hence, unconstitutional. The original ¶ 321 of the Discipline is restored and maintained, and the changes made thereto by the 2012 General Conference are null, void, and of no effect. Calendar Item 358, the new transitional leave ¶ 354, is declared unconstitutional, and Calendar Item 359, which removed the language of a transitional leave from ¶ 354 of the Discipline, is also declared unconstitutional. The current language for a transitional leave as provided for in ¶ 354 is restored and maintained.

STATEMENT OF FACTS
The records of the 2012 General Conference reflect that Petition Number: 20303-MH ¶337-G deleted language that refers to security of appointment and added language that describes next steps if an elder or associate member is not continued under appointment. The Petition, Calendar Item 355, was amended and adopted by the Legislative Committee on Ministry and Higher Education. Calendar Item 335, as amended and adopted, was approved by the 2012 General Conference on May 5, 2012.

The 2012 Session of the General Conference requested a declaratory decision from the Judicial Council regarding the constitutionality of the approved legislation (Calendar Item 355).
Calendar item amended ¶ 337 of the 2008 Discipline to read as follows:
Paragraph 337:
“1. Ordained elders and persons who have been granted a license for pastoral ministry and who have been approved by vote of the clergy members in full connection may be appointed to local churches. All clergy members and licensed local pastors to be appointed shall assume a lifestyle consistent with Christian teaching as set forth in the Social Principles.
2. Elders and deacons, associate members, provisional members, and persons licensed for pastoral ministry may be appointed to ministry settings that extend the ministry of The United Methodist Church and the witness and service of Christ’s love and justice in the world. They shall be given the same moral support by the annual conference as are persons in appointments to pastoral charges. Their effectiveness shall be evaluated in the context of the specific setting in which their ministry is performed. Such ministry settings shall include teaching, pastoral care and counseling, chaplaincy, campus ministry, social services, and other ministries so recognized by the conference Board of Ordained Ministry and approved by the bishop.
a) Full connection and provisional member elders, associate members, and persons licensed for pastoral ministry may be appointed to Extension Ministries serving in ministries of pastoral care in specialized settings. See ¶¶ 326, 343-344 for specific information about Extension Ministries.
b) Deacons in provisional membership and full connection may be appointed to appointments beyond the local church that extend the witness and service of Christ’s love and justice in a ministry to both the community and the church. This ministry connects community and church and equips all Christians to fulfill their own calls to Christian service. See ¶¶ 326, 328, 329, 331 for specific information about these ministries.
c) All persons in such appointments shall:
(1) be appointed to a setting that provides an appropriate support and accountability structure;
(2) continue to be accountable to the annual conference for the practice of their ministry;
(3) provide an annual report, including a narrative of their ministry, evidence of continuing education, and evidence of an annual evaluation in their setting;
(4) maintain a relationship with a charge conference.
3. In the case that an elder or associate member in good standing is not continued under appointment one of the following steps shall be taken:
a) If the elder is not continued because a missional appointment is not available, then the bishop shall recommend the elder to the Board of Ordained Ministry for transitional leave (¶354).
b) If the elder is not continued because of ineffectiveness then the bishop shall initiate an administrative process in 361 at least 90 days prior to the annual conference.
4. a) Each annual conference shall quadrennially name a task force consisting of: four members named by the Conference Lay leader; at least two clergy members from the Board of Ordained Ministry nominated by the Chair of the Board of Ordained Ministry and elected by the clergy session; a superintendent named by the Bishop; and the Bishop. The task force shall meet annually to develop a list

b) The Cabinet shall report the following information annually to the Board of ordained Ministry Executive Committee: 1) those elders, provisional elders and associate members who have not received a full-time missional appointment and the rationale; 2) those elders, provisional elders and associate members who have not received an appointment for reasons of ineffectiveness and the steps which have been taken in the complaint process; 3) statistics by age, ethnicity and gender of elders who have not received a full-time missional appointment; 4) learnings that have been gleaned as appointment-making is carried out in a new way. This data will also become part of the agenda of the Committee on the Episcopacy at the conference and jurisdictional level. This data will also become part of the evaluation of bishops by the Committee on the Episcopacy at the conference and jurisdictional levels.”

From the records of the 2012 General Conference, as culled from page 2760 of the Daily Christian Advocate (DCA), May 5, 2012, a lay delegate made the motion to seek a declaratory decision from the Judicial Council and asked the specific question “Does Calendar Item 355 of the 2010 (sic) General Conference removing guaranteed appointments to clergy violate either the third restrictive rule of the constitution under paragraph 19 by setting up a process that can do away with the authority of the episcopacy in our denomination and/or the fourth restrictive rule of the constitution, which is paragraph 20, by taking away a right of clergy without a hearing, trial, or resort to any form of appeal and/or in violation of historical precedence to the contrary? “
The motion received more than the required 20% vote of the delegates of the 2012 General Conference (Yes, 397; No, 341).

An oral hearing was held on October 24, 2012, in Elk Grove Village, Illinois. Bishop Alfred Wesley Gwinn, Jr. appeared for the Council of Bishops. Frederick K. Brewington and John P. Feagins appeared.

JURISDICTION
The Judicial Council has jurisdiction under ¶2609.1 of the 2008 Discipline.

ANALYSIS AND RATIONALE
Paragraph 16.5 of the Discipline gives to the General Conference the power “To define and fix powers, duties and privileges of the episcopacy….” ¶16.16 of the Discipline gives to the General Conference the power “To enact such other legislation as may be necessary, subject to the limitations and restrictions of the Constitution of the Church”. Therefore, when the 2012 General Conference adopted Calendar Item 355, it was exercising its powers under these provisions of the Constitution.

In the case before us, we are being asked to determine whether the removal of security of appointments violate the third and fourth restrictive rules of the Constitution.

We observed that the specific question being asked the Judicial Council contains the phrase “guaranteed appointments”. This phrase is not found in the Discipline nor is it found in the revised ¶ 337. However, “guaranteed appointments” is a phrase frequently used by various speakers and writers (see the Report of the 2009-2012 Study of Ministry Commission, Advance Daily Christian Advocate pp. 1383-94, especially p. 1389). This has become a common phrase to describe security of appointment.
Though the request for this Judicial Council decision relates specifically to Calendar Item 355 that changed ¶ 337 in the Discipline, we note that changes to ¶ 337 resulted in numerous other changes to other paragraphs in the Discipline. These other paragraphs were not cited in the request for the declaratory judgment.
Changes in ¶ 337 (Calendar Item 355) resulted from recommendations submitted by the Study of Ministry Commission. Other recommendations from this Commission that were approved by the 2012 General Conference included Calendar Item 359 (deletion of transitional leave from ¶ 354, which had allowed for clergy to request transitional leave under only a very limited provision-transitioning from an extension ministry appointment to another appointment for a period lasting a maximum of 12 months); Calendar Item 358 (establishing a new transitional leave, new ¶ 354, which includes a new provision that allows for transitional leave to be at the initiation of the bishop; allows transitional leave to be granted for reason other than not being appointed; lasting up to a maximum of 24 months; and, includes a new subdivision that states “that clergy on transitional leave of absence shall have no claim on conference funds”); Calendar Item 356 (allowing for an appointment to less than full time service, ¶ 338); and, Calendar Items 352 (eliminating security of appointment for associate members). Though relating to or growing out of the change to ¶ 337, none of these Calendar items were included in the request for constitutional review. However, we note that the parties in their briefs acknowledged that these Calendar Items were linked to the issue. Hence, they were addressed in the respective briefs.
The Legislative Committee on Ministry and Higher Education also considered the elimination of ¶ 334 (Petition 20299, page 1423 ADCA). Paragraph 334 contains similar language that was deleted in ¶ 337. The legislative committee rejected this petition, thus retaining the current disciplinary language in respect of security of appointment.
The action of the 2012 General Conference in approving Calendar Item ¶ 355 changed ¶ 337 by the deletion of ¶ 337.1, the requirement that all elders in good standing shall be continued under appointment. The current ¶ 337.1, which was deleted, reads as follows:
We observed that the specific question being asked the Judicial Council contains the phrase “guaranteed appointments”. This phrase is not found in the Discipline nor is it found in the revised ¶ 337. However, “guaranteed appointments” is a phrase frequently used by various speakers and writers (see the Report of the 2009-2012 Study of Ministry Commission, Advance Daily Christian Advocate pp. 1383-94, especially p. 1389). This has become a common phrase to describe security of appointment.
Though the request for this Judicial Council decision relates specifically to Calendar Item 355 that changed ¶ 337 in the Discipline, we note that changes to ¶ 337 resulted in numerous other changes to other paragraphs in the Discipline. These other paragraphs were not cited in the request for the declaratory judgment.
Changes in ¶ 337 (Calendar Item 355) resulted from recommendations submitted by the Study of Ministry Commission. Other recommendations from this Commission that were approved by the 2012 General Conference included Calendar Item 359 (deletion of transitional leave from ¶ 354, which had allowed for clergy to request transitional leave under only a very limited provision-transitioning from an extension ministry appointment to another appointment for a period lasting a maximum of 12 months); Calendar Item 358 (establishing a new transitional leave, new ¶ 354, which includes a new provision that allows for transitional leave to be at the initiation of the bishop; allows transitional leave to be granted for reason other than not being appointed; lasting up to a maximum of 24 months; and, includes a new subdivision that states “that clergy on transitional leave of absence shall have no claim on conference funds”); Calendar Item 356 (allowing for an appointment to less than full time service, ¶ 338); and, Calendar Items 352 (eliminating security of appointment for associate members). Though relating to or growing out of the change to ¶ 337, none of these Calendar items were included in the request for constitutional review. However, we note that the parties in their briefs acknowledged that these Calendar Items were linked to the issue. Hence, they were addressed in the respective briefs.
The Legislative Committee on Ministry and Higher Education also considered the elimination of ¶ 334 (Petition 20299, page 1423 ADCA). Paragraph 334 contains similar language that was deleted in ¶ 337. The legislative committee rejected this petition, thus retaining the current disciplinary language in respect of security of appointment.
The action of the 2012 General Conference in approving Calendar Item ¶ 355 changed ¶ 337 by the deletion of ¶ 337.1, the requirement that all elders in good standing shall be continued under appointment. The current ¶ 337.1, which was deleted, reads as follows:
“All elders in full connection who are in good standing in an annual conference shall be continued under appointment by the bishop unless they are granted a sabbatical leave, an incapacity leave (¶ 357), family leave, leave of absence, retirement, or have failed to meet the requirements for continued eligibility (¶ 334.2,3), provided that if the elder is appointed to serve in an affiliated relationship in a missionary conference (¶ 586.4.b) and that appointment is terminated by the bishop who presides in the missionary conference, than the responsibility for meeting this obligation rests with the bishop of the conference of which the elder is a member.”
Similar language in ¶ 334.1, which was retained, reads as follows:
“……..Every effective elder in full connection who is in good standing shall be continued under appointment by the bishop provided that if the elder is appointed to serve in an affiliated relationship in a missionary conference (¶ 586) and that appointment is terminated by the bishop who presides in the missionary conference, than the responsibility for meeting this obligation rests with the bishop of the conference of which the elder is a member.”
When reviewing legislation for constitutionality, we defer to the legislative authority of the General Conference. In reviewing acts of the General Conference for constitutionality, our first inclination is to save legislation, if at all possible, and not destroy it. See Decision 1210.
The third and fourth Restrictive Rules state as follows:
¶ 19. Article III – “The General Conference shall not change or alter any part or rule of our government so as to do away with episcopacy or destroy the plan of our itinerant general superintendency.
¶ 20. Article IV – The General Conference shall not do away with the privileges of our clergy of right to trial by a committee and of an appeal; neither shall it do away with the privileges of our members of right to trial before the church, or by a committee, and of an appeal.
Security of appointment has long been a part of the tradition of The United Methodist Church and its predecessor bodies. Security of appointment for clergy in good standing was first articulated by the 1956 General Conference with the addition of ¶ 432.9:
“Every traveling preacher, unless retired, supernumerary, on sabbatical leave, or under arrest of character, must receive an appointment.”
This provision remained unchanged and untouched over the years and was retained in 1968 Discipline but rewritten as a result of the merger of The Methodist Church and The Evangelical United Brethren Church. The rewritten language appeared in ¶ 316 and ¶ 332 of the 1968 Discipline:
¶ 328.1 All elders in full connection who are in good standing in an annual conference shall be continued under appointment by the bishop unless they are granted a sabbatical leave, a disability leave, family leave, a leave of absence, retirement, or have failed to meet the requirements for continued eligibility (325.2).
¶ 325.1 ….Every effective elder in full connection who is in good standing shall be continued under appointment by the bishop.
Over the next 16 years, the language has again remained consistent and unchanged, except for the addition of provisions relating to appointments in a missionary conference, ¶ 337.1 of the 2004 Discipline.
In several cases, the Judicial Council has upheld and affirmed security of appointment as a characteristic of The United Methodist Church plan for itinerant general superintendency. In Decision 380 the Judicial Council held:
There is no directly stated Constitutional right to an appointment. However, it is implicit in Constitutional provisions such as Restrictive Rule III (Par.17) which forbids the General Conference to destroy the plan of our itinerant general superintendency and Paragraph 59 which authorizes the bishops to appoint ministers to charges. It becomes explicit as an absolute right clearly set forth in ¶¶ 308.3, 316 and 391.10, disciplinary provisions which have long been a part of the tradition of the predecessor bodies of The United Methodist Church.” See Decision 380. Also see Decisions 459, 462 and 492.
Action of the 2012 General Conference in removing security of appointment would have the effect of overturning our historic security of appointment.
In Decision 398, the Judicial Council stated that “Of course, the position is correct that no General Conference or Annual Conference or any other body may take any action that would change or alter the government of The United Methodist Church in such a fashion as to destroy the plan of the itinerant General superintendency.”
Paragraph 337, as amended, is in conflict with ¶ 334, which was not amended by the 2012 General Conference and maintains security of appointment. Calendar Item 355 deleted the sentence…. “All elders in full connection who are in good standing in the annual conference shall be continued under appointment……..” Similar sentence in ¶ 334 was retained. Petition 20299 which had proposed to delete it was rejected by the legislative committee on Ministry and Higher Education. Paragraph 337 as amended is in direct conflict with ¶ 334 and cannot be reconciled with ¶ 334. There is no indication that the 2012 General Conference intended to repeal ¶ 334. Paragraph 334 remained unchanged.
Also, Calendar Item 352, which amended ¶ 321 by removing security of appointment for associate members, is also in direct conflict with ¶ 334. Paragraph 321 and ¶ 337, as amended, cannot coexist with ¶ 334 as they are incompatible; therefore, the amendments to ¶ 321 and ¶ 337, as contained in Calendar Items 352 and 355, must be declared unconstitutional.
The fourth Restrictive Rule state as follows:
¶ 20. Article IV – The General Conference shall not do away with the privileges of our clergy of right to trial by a committee and of an appeal; neither shall it do away with the privileges of our members of right to trial before the church, or by a committee, and of an appeal.
The right to trial and appeal by our clergy members is an absolute right that has been expressed and upheld repeatedly by the Judicial Council. The right to appeal has been extended to instances where a clergy member has not been brought up on charges yet still has been determined to be unappointable or otherwise unacceptable to be appointed. Decision 351 is worth noting in this respect:
“Equally historic is the method for protecting the rights of ministers who are not under charges, against whom no formal accusations have been brought, and therefore for whom no trial is properly in order. This method has used long-accepted practices and procedures to determine the acceptability of a person for appointment to a parish in the church”.
We have found no instance in which there have been provisions for not appointing clergy involuntarily to ministerial settings other than chargeable offenses or some form of unacceptability for appointment.
In Decision 351 the Judicial Council stated “The United Methodist Church has a heritage of concern with the rights of persons. That concern has repeatedly made provision for the protection of the rights of its members and of its ministers.”
Calendar Item 358, the new ¶ 354, establishes a new transitional leave which allows for transitional leave to be at the initiation of the bishop rather than being restricted to the clergy’s initiative. It also allows clergy to be refused an appointment for reasons other than those related to some form of ineffectiveness, etc. The leave can last up to a maximum period of 24 months, without the clergy having any claim on conference funds.
The right given to the bishop in this new provision to initiate and place provisional, associate and full members in good standing on transitional leave undermines the right to trial and appeal.
Fair process procedures, trials and appeals are integral parts of the privilege of our clergy of right to trial by a committee and of appeal. In the instance of where a member is not under any formal trial, yet the annual conference is seeking to appoint said member to a status other than ministry appointment, certain safeguards and requirements have to be ensured. These include:
i) That there is a thorough process of investigation, petition and hearing…; and,
ii) The elder must be determined to be unacceptable for appointment to a parish in the church.
The new ¶ 354 lacks these mandatory requirements. This is unlike ¶ 355, which requires some form of accusation against the clergy member affecting their good standing in the annual conference. Moreover, a request for involuntary leave made by the bishop and the district superintendent automatically invokes the fair process procedures set forth in ¶ 362.2.
Calendar Item 358, new transitional leave ¶ 354, is unconstitutional. Calendar Item 359 removing the language of a transitional leave from ¶ 354 of the Discipline is null and void and the current language for a transitional leave in ¶354 is restored and maintained.
DECISION
Security of appointment has long been a part of the tradition of The United Methodist Church and its predecessor bodies. Abolishing security of appointment would destroy our historic plan for our itinerant superintendency. Fair process procedures, trials and appeals are integral parts of the privilege of our clergy of right to trial by a committee and of appeal and is an absolute right which cannot be eradicated by legislation. The amendments to ¶ 337, as contained in Calendar Item 355, are unconstitutional and violate the third and fourth restrictive rules of the Constitution. The original ¶ 337 of the Discipline is restored and maintained and the changes made thereto at 2012 General Conference are null, void and of no effect. The amendments to ¶ 321, as contained in Calendar Items 352, is also declared repugnant to the Constitution and, hence, unconstitutional. The original ¶ 321 of the Discipline is restored and maintained and the changes made thereto by the 2012 general Conference are null, void, and of no effect. Calendar Item 358, the new transitional leave ¶ 354, is declared unconstitutional and Calendar Item 359, which removed the language of a transitional leave from ¶ 354 of the Discipline, is also declared unconstitutional. The current language for a transitional leave as provided for in ¶ 354 is restored and maintained.
Beth Capen was absent. Sandra Lutz, first lay alternate, participated in this decision.
October 27, 2012

Any request for reconsideration must be filed within the guidelines spelled out in “Rules of Practice and Procedure” on the Judicial Council website and must be filed within forty-five days of this notification.
Sincerely,
F. Belton Joyner, Jr., Secretary
Secretary, The Judicial Council

Advertisements
This entry was posted in DEA Reports. Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to UMC JUDICIAL COUNCIL UPHOLDS GUARANTEED APPOINTMENT FOR CLERGY

  1. chae s. sone says:

    Who can control the deviant leaders to guarantee appointment of the deviant ones for life time? According to our experience, the corrupt clergies and church officers continue their control in corrupt ways. et eliminate the corrupt fake clergies. Hay I love you, can you punch down these guys noses How to rescue our church from the hijackers
    여러 임원 들은 오는11/11(주일): 2012년 정기 임원회를 갖습니다.

    I am proposing to the church conference at this time to pass a resolution to audit the financial mismanagement of the church since Rev. Won Tae Cha’s appointment to Rev. Chul Woo Chang’s ministry to correct the irregularities.

    저는이번임원회에과거의교회지도자들이부정행위로우리주님교회에재정에손해를끼친일이있으니이일을 조사하여서고치돌록 결정하여주시기요청합니다
    차원태목사의 목회역사를보내 드립니다 교회임원의책임은 미듬과 도덕, 교회규측에따라서 교회를 지도할책임이 있읍니다 과거범죄사실를 조사해서 장철우목사님목회때 까지 a quarter century부정사실를 고처야합니다 그래서우리후손들에게 우리의 도덕적 신앙을가르처 줍시다 Please see the attached files.
    Yours in Christ, .Chae S. Sone

    교우여러분에게

    예수 안에서 깨끗한 우리의 교회를 유지하는 방법을차집시다.
    지난 25 년간 (Columbia University) 근처에 이 역사적인우리 한인교회 Korean Methodist Church and Institute 에서생긴 우리 교회의 부그업고잔인한 경험에 대해 알려 드립니다

    1.Major문제는 그들이 그릇된 교회재정관리에 참여 하고– Embezzlements 와 횡영.- 그들은 서로의 mismanagements 를 서로감추고 오래동안 게속했읍니다
    2, 그들은 자신들에 범죄를 감추고 은폐하기
    위해목사 패는무죄한사람을구타하고 그아버지와아들 을 교회안에서집단 살인을 공모하였다고 소송하고 살인범으로서 NY State Supreme Court, Nassau County 에서 여러해동안 잔인한재판을한 잔인한 가짜 예수쟁이들입니다 모든재판비용은 교회흠친돈을썻답니다 참지헤있는 잔인한 가짜 목사와 기독교인들입니다
    3. 목사님들은 종종 문제를 가짜, MBA, 가짜 MD, 진짜MD 진짜박사, Columbia faculties 들이 가짜 affidavits 을써서 히생자들를 소송하는고문을한 장노권사도 협조한 잔인하고 썩은 한국 이민 교인들의행동입니다 한국이민 교인들중에는 이러케썩은도덕의 인간들이 있는 슲으고 챙피한. 이교회이민역사입니다 남을정신적고통을주고도 성찬을받는 성자목사들이랍니다 

    4.$ 2millon 교회의 antique 목욕탕
    안익태선생이쓴목욕탕,역사가 깊은 교회는 $ 2millon 가치의, 교회의 antique 목욕탕 누가훔쳤나?.
    1932s 한국 애국가 작곡가가, IK Tae Ahn는roomed in the church dormitory. 그교회 방안에서 살면서목욕하고 한국 국민의 애국가를 작곡하였습니다 (안익태선생과함게교회생활한 한승인장노님책에따르면)
    차 원태 목사와 그들은 교회 도둑들 사이에 도난한 목욕탕 소유권에 대한 분쟁소송을했답니다 Korean Church bathtub lawsuit 차 원태 목사의 통역 Mr. Pyun Sun Whan 에 의하면, “그것 bathtub 이 200 만 Dollars가치가 된다고” 차원태 목사는 COURT 재판장에게 증언한, 통역을 했다고요
    차 원태 목사는 누구가 그보물을 훔쳤나 알려주시기 바랍니다 The legal owner is Korean Methodist Church and Institute,
    그 러나 우리역사깊은 교회에는 아무도 목욕탕를 반환하도록 요청 하고 차질 신도가 없 읍니다 모도다 기독교동지, 우리역사가깊은 폭도들의 미듬과 세력이 크고 악독해서 교회보물 국보를 차질신도가 없 읍니다 한국의 정부와 신도 들이차저 주실수 있나요!!

    6. Attorney Gen Nathan Courtney 에게
    보고했더니COURT PAPER를CHECK 하라고요
    7. 새미듬의 식구가누구인가 가짜선저자들으의three court case papers 를 open forum 해서 교회청소를해야 기독교원리가습니다 누가 우리를 구할수있을까요? 죄인들은미국에서 추방해여야 기독교 principle 이 습니다
    8. 새로임명바든 이용보목사님의 책임이 참크고 그의 목회에승리와성공은 우리교회와 우리교도들, 한국사람의 승리입니다 우리모다 승리하도록 기도합시다 our bishop Jeremiah J. Park missed the good chance to do his duty, by negatively fostering Koreans for UMC.
    9. An independent audit of the church finances since Rev. Won Tae Cha’s time to date would
    clearly direct the right moral course for the church and we should demonstrate the moral principles to our children as Christians through the audit. Remember 8th commandment, “Thou shalt not steal.”

    10. Rev. Chul Woo Chang tried to upside down Christian justice to make a crooked Korean justice and he tried to make his Editorial Board of Sammul publish the fake lawsuit stories by Ms. Kwang Hee Kim to further damage the innocent victims. Why Korean Christians are so un-Christian? (5, 9)
    It is a short history of the deviant cruel Korean ministry for a quarter century.
    11. During a court session, Judge F. Dana Winslow warned their attorney Morton Povman If you bring this mass murder case again, you loose your license practice law in the State.”
    Remember, Jesus said, “I am the way and the truth and the life. No one can go to the Father except through Me.” John 14:6.

    REFERENCES; READ MORE ON WEBSITE BY GOOGLING

    1. Gospel according to Rev. Won Tae Cha
    2. Gospel according to Rev. Chul Woo Chang
    3. How to clean up Korean Methodist Church and Institute scandals

    4. gospel according to fake M.D. Young Kim CUNY Sophie Davis
    5. Gospel according to fake Columbia MBA Steve H. Park
    6. 경향신문 | Facebookwww.facebook.com/kyunghyangshinmun?filter
    7. REV. CAROL COX’S WAY FOR KOREAN CHURCH
    8 . Gospel according to Bishop Jeremiah J. Park KUMC
    9. MEMBERS, SAMMUL EDITORIAL BOARD. Rev. Chul Woo Chang organized it to let Ms. Kwang Hee
    Kim wrote a fake article in April issue of Sammul, 90th anniversary of the founding of the church, criminalizing our family, me, my beloved wife and son possibly in defense of Rev. Cha group’s lawsuits against our family, the embezzlement and the stolen bathtub. The editors criminally motivated to literally cover up Rev. Won Tae Cha’s anti Christian ministry.
    That is the poor young souls of the Editorial board were criminally joined liars, demonstrating the traditional corrupt nature of this church; Rev. Paul Chul woo Chang, Philip Kim, Columbia faculty.,Chul Woo Chung, Brookhaven National Laboratory.
    Hojoon Jon, Chief editor, Joong Hyon Cho, Young Nan Ha, assistant pastor., These brilliant young committee members seem to be morally colorblind and unable to see the right from the wrong even though they are professed Christians.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s